
Teaching and Using Dialogue in an American Academic Health Center - James M Herman, Alan Adelman and John Neely
Three physicians brought dialogue into Penn State's Hershey Medical Center. When pharmaceutical representatives divided faculty, the turning point wasn't argument; it was someone asking what they were teaching students by allowing pharma in their clinics.
Three physicians trace their dialogue journey from the 1998-99 Leadership for Collective Intelligence program with Bill Isaacs and Peter Garrett. They brought dialogue into Penn State's Hershey Medical Center; first within Family Medicine, then institution-wide through a leadership course running five years. A key test: whether pharmaceutical representatives should be allowed in practices. Faculty were polarised until someone asked what this was "teaching" medical students. Without voting, consensus emerged to ban pharma reps; the first department at the institution to do so. Their leadership course revealed that participants' initial assumptions about problems were usually wrong; deeper issues had to be uncovered first. Year after year, participants described "The Hershey Way" identically: extreme organisational politeness blocking difficult conversations, and false empowerment where people were told they could decide but punished for breaking unspoken rules. Each author reflects on how dialogue shaped their subsequent careers in systems thinking, functional medicine, and medical education.
Format
Paper
Category
Topics
Dialogue in organisations and systems
Access
member
- Page 1